Enforcing a three-layer probabilistic assume-guarantee architecture on multi-agent LLM workflows prevents the propagation of local agent hallucinations across persistent memory and shared tool-integration spaces.
Adversarial Debate Score
47% survival rate under critique
Expert panel critique
Independent views, each critiquing the hypothesis on its own — the score rewards genuine disagreement and discounts consensus.
Supporting Research Papers
- Position: A Three-Layer Probabilistic Assume-Guarantee Architecture Is Structurally Required for Safe LLM Agent Deployment
This position paper argues that enforcing LLM agent safety within a single abstraction layer is not merely suboptimal but categorically insufficient for deployed LLM agents -- a structural consequence...
- Before Agents Speak: Pre-hoc Failure Risk Inference in Multi-Agent Systems
LLM-based multi-agent systems (MAS) have exhibited remarkable capabilities in collaborative reasoning and decision-making, yet their interconnected communications introduce new systemic risk: localize...
- Trustworthy Agentic AI: A Survey and Taxonomy of Secure Coordination and Hallucination Mitigation in Multi-Agent Large Language Model Systems
Background: Large language model (LLM)-based agentic systems are evolving beyond single-turn generators into autonomous, toolusing, multi-agent workflows with persistent memory and self-directed plann...
- A hierarchical memory architecture overcomes context limits in long-horizon multi-agent computational modeling
Large language models (LLMs) demonstrate remarkable reasoning capabilities, yet their stateless architecture fundamentally limits deployment in long-horizon research workflows requiring multi-session ...
- Locally Coherent, Globally Incoherent: Bounding Compositional Incoherence in Multi-Component LLM Agents
Multi-component LLM agents assemble probabilistic claims from components that each see only part of a joint problem; the composition can violate basic probability axioms even when every component is l...
Formal Verification
Z3 checks whether the hypothesis is internally consistent, not whether it is empirically true.