**Agentic AI-driven modulation of single-cell foundation model attention (ELISA/scGPT) will reveal coalition-based regulatory deviations in confluent tissue dynamics (active foam model), where persistent Brownian motions synchronize with co-expression clusters rather than individual gene signals.**
Adversarial Debate Score
53% survival rate under critique
Expert panel critique
Independent views, each critiquing the hypothesis on its own — the score rewards genuine disagreement and discounts consensus.
Supporting Research Papers
- Systematic Evaluation of Single-Cell Foundation Model Interpretability Reveals Attention Captures Co-Expression Rather Than Unique Regulatory Signal
We present a systematic evaluation framework - thirty-seven analyses, 153 statistical tests, four cell types, two perturbation modalities - for assessing mechanistic interpretability in single-cell fo...
- ELISA: An Interpretable Hybrid Generative AI Agent for Expression-Grounded Discovery in Single-Cell Genomics
Translating single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) data into mechanistic biological hypotheses remains a critical bottleneck, as agentic AI systems lack direct access to transcriptomic representations...
- Causal Circuit Tracing Reveals Distinct Computational Architectures in Single-Cell Foundation Models: Inhibitory Dominance, Biological Coherence, and Cross-Model Convergence
Motivation: Sparse autoencoders (SAEs) decompose foundation model activations into interpretable features, but causal feature-to-feature interactions across network depth remain unknown for biological...
- Sparse autoencoders reveal organized biological knowledge but minimal regulatory logic in single-cell foundation models: a comparative atlas of Geneformer and scGPT
Background: Single-cell foundation models such as Geneformer and scGPT encode rich biological information, but whether this includes causal regulatory logic rather than statistical co-expression remai...
Computational Validation
AI models reveal complex gene interactions but face challenges in individual signal relevance.
Method: literature_meta · Result: inconclusive · Confidence: 60%
Formal Verification
Z3 checks whether the hypothesis is internally consistent, not whether it is empirically true.